bmap files by themselves will be much use. Without read access to the Type1 files, I don't think the. bmap file and for it to work, we'd need access to *both* of these. So (for example) I'm guessing that 'Handwriting-Dakota' is a Type1 font resource, and there's a matching bitmap resource in a. This was common on classic Mac OS, and so users who had extensive font collections in pre-OS X days and have brought these fonts forward to newer systems may still be using them. bmap files will (I think) be bitmaps ('screen fonts') that accompany individual PostScript Type1 fonts which are typically in extension-less files. > and I don't know if those are actual font file. > in the system, but also several paths in your list don't have an extension > Running the Terminal Command for fonts I get the following fonts showing up. > (In reply to Jonah Lee Walker from comment #13) (In reply to Haik Aftandilian from comment #14)

Running the Terminal Command for fonts I get the following fonts showing up.ġ 05/881481668/TimesNewRomanPS-BoldItalicMTġ fontvault/SA/l/TT/freefont/Gunship/1/2127239866/Gunship If the above command doesn't work for you, there are some other debugging steps we can try. I'm not an expert on fonts, but the Wikipedia page on it lists type 1 postscript fonts as having extension.

It could be that you have fonts with a different extension and we'll have to fix the browser sandbox rules to account for that. (I haven't tried this command on OS X 10.10 yet.)Īt the moment, our sandbox will allow files ending in. $ system_profiler SPFontsDataType|grep Location|awk -F. Running the following command from the Terminal (/Applications/Utilities/Terminal) should print a list of all the font file extensions you're using (and how many of each). Most are OpenType, TrueType or Type 1 Postscript formats. > somewhere as some of these fonts are going on 20 years old, but they're not

I mean, they may exist in a folder on the hard drive

Fontexplorer x pro vs suitcase fusion 6